Skip to main content
← All free resources
Free resource · vaeris.com

The OTA Commission Calculator

Work out exactly what OTA commissions cost your property each year — and what recovering even 10% of those bookings direct would be worth.

What this calculator does

Commission is deducted before OTA payouts reach your account, so it never appears as a cost line in most resort P&Ls — it hides inside “revenue.” This worksheet pulls it out. Work through the four tables with your own numbers; the whole exercise takes ten minutes with figures from your PMS or channel manager.

Step 1 — Your room revenue base

Worked example: a 40-room independent resort.

LineFormulaExampleYour property
A. Rooms40
B. Available room nightsA × 36514,600
C. Occupancyfrom PMS, last 12 months58%
D. Sold room nightsB × C8,468
E. Average daily rate (ADR)room revenue ÷ D$260
F. Annual room revenueD × E$2,201,680

Step 2 — Your OTA exposure

Independent resorts typically run 70–90% of room revenue through OTAs. Check your channel manager or PMS source report for the real figure — don't guess low.

LineFormulaExampleYour property
G. OTA share of revenueOTA revenue ÷ F75%
H. OTA-sourced revenueF × G$1,651,260
I. Blended commission ratesee Step 3 to derive18%
J. Annual commission billH × I$297,227

Step 3 — Commission rate scenarios

Your effective rate is rarely the headline 15%. Preferred-partner programmes, visibility boosters, and channel-exclusive mobile rates stack on top — each looked small when it was switched on. Find your true blended rate: total commission deducted last year ÷ OTA-sourced revenue.

ScenarioEffective rateAnnual commission (example property)Your property
Base commission only15%$247,689
Typical blended (some programmes on)18%$297,227
Preferred partner + boosters20%$330,252
Everything switched on, year-round25%$412,815

Every programme adding to your rate should be re-justified annually. Boosting visibility into a soft shoulder season can be rational; paying 24% on peak-season nights that would have sold anyway is not. Most properties that run this audit find 2–4 points of effective commission they no longer need to pay.

Step 4 — What a mix shift is worth

The goal isn't zero OTA — it's moving the bookings that would have come to you anyway (repeat guests, brand searches, long stays) onto your own site. Model the shift at your blended rate:

Mix shiftFormulaAnnual saving (example, 18%)Your property
5 points (75% → 70%)F × 0.05 × I$19,815
10 points (75% → 65%)F × 0.10 × I$39,630
15 points (75% → 60%)F × 0.15 × I$59,445
20 points (75% → 55%)F × 0.20 × I$79,260

Against those savings, the machinery of a direct booking programme — booking engine ($2,000–$4,000), direct booking improvement ($3,500–$5,000), email automation ($2,500–$3,500) — pays back inside the first year at even a 5-point shift. Add 5–10% of booking value on top for the ancillary effects: direct guests give you their real email, take pre-arrival upsells more often, and can be re-marketed for the return stay without paying commission twice.

Reading your result

Line J as % of revenue (J ÷ F)What it usually means
Under 8%Healthy mix — or under-distribution. Check you're not simply missing platforms entirely.
8–13%Normal for an independent. Worth optimising programme settings and repeat-guest capture.
Over 13%Overdependence. A direct booking programme is likely your highest-return project this year.

Two of the three engagements in our published results started exactly here: a Thailand property at 92% OTA dependence with zero direct bookings identified $312,000 a year in gaps; a Fijian property on 3 platforms with static pricing identified $185,000. Run your own numbers above — then, if line J surprised you, the free two-minute scorecard at vaeris.com/scorecard estimates how much of it is recoverable. The full diagnostic prices every gap, guaranteed to find $50,000 a year or it's free.